Fraudulent ‘Synthetic Identities’ Are Growing, Say APAC Banks

by CXOtoday News Desk    Feb 07, 2018

fraud

Six in ten banks in Asia Pacific say that they are experiencing application fraud using synthetic identities according to a recent poll by FICO, and a further one in five banks say that the number of fraudulent applications for credit cards now sits between five to 10 percent of all applications, states a FICO survey.

According to the study, 44 percent of banks believe that social platforms and mobile apps are the most likely to suffer a data breach. Also, half of banking respondents reported an increase in card testing of 25-50 percent and a further quarter said it was even higher at 50-100 percent. 

“Identity fraud was a growing problem in 2017,” said Dan McConaghy, president of FICO in Asia Pacific. “As prevention technologies have improved to stop activities such as card skimming, criminals are now stealing identities or constructing ‘fake people’ to get real credit cards.”

Synthetic identity fraud is where new identities are made by blending elements from multiple individuals, making the uncovering of fraudulent transactions more complicated. Scammers take these new identities and apply for accounts to build validity for these new personas. Products such as pre-paid credit cards, utility bills and personal loans have all been used as a starting point to build credibility and credit-worthiness in a process that can take the criminal many months, sometimes years.

“The availability of personal information online via social media platforms and mobile apps has made it easier for culprits to mix fake and real personal information,” said McConaghy. “Not only are they stealing data from profile information that is open on the web, they are also breaching poorly defended mobile apps that collect personal information.”

With all of this data available to criminals to try and apply for credit cards fraudulently, it wasn’t surprising that dealing with application fraud was the key priority for four in ten banks in 2018.

The survey also reveals that half of banking respondents reported an increase of 25-50 percent in card testing. This is an activity where criminals test the fraud rules of the banks to check what limits and which purchase categories will result in the blocking of a card rather than an approval. A further quarter of respondents said it was even higher at 50-100 percent. This growth demonstrates the increasing sophistication of organized fraud rings.

“The rise in card testing is significant because small purchases often seem unremarkable to both banks and customers,” said McConaghy. “Fraud analytics is really the only way to block more fraud, because it can ‘see’ new fraud patterns.”

When asked about the key obstacles to tackling more fraud, four in ten banks said the key reason was a lack of budget. The second most popular reason was that the fraud department was dealing with too many false positives.

One of the new analytic techniques that is gaining favour as the fraud environment shifts to data breaches and identity theft, is identifying the common point of purchase for compromised cards. This is achieved by using analytics to link transactions that were later determined to be fraudulent. By identifying the common places where comprised cards were previously used, banks can identify the source of leaked card information.

Around half of the banks surveyed currently have such a solution in place, but FICO expects this will grow next year.